Skip to content
Toggle main navigation
Home
Events
Opportunities
News & Publications
T90/R90 HEAL Pain Cohort Program
Mobile App
About
Affiliate Networks
US Association for the Study of Pain (USASP)
Music4Pain
ForceNET
Pain Research Forum (PRF)
More
Open dropdown to see remaining menu items
Log in
Request to Join
Request for Information on Measuring and Rewarding Scientific Impact
Published on June 18, 2026
Notice NOT-OD-26-087 from the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts
Continue reading on website
Other news
Standardized Episiotomy Using a Blade-Based Device Reduces Long-Term Perineal Pain and Improves Sexual Function: A Randomized Controlled Trial
June 17, 2026
Int Urogynecol J. 2026 Jun 17. doi: 10.1007/s00192-026-06763-9. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTINTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Although routine episiotomy is discouraged, mediolateral episiotomy remains necessary in selected clinical situations. Variability in incision technique may influence pelvic floor-related morbidity. We hypothesized that a standardized blade-based episiotomy technique would be
How Would You Measure and Reward Scientific Impact and Replicable Research Practices?
June 18, 2026
What does scientific impact look like today?For decades, measures such as publication counts, citation rates, and grant funding have been primarily used to assess the success of researchers. Yet biomedical research has become increasingly collaborative, interdisciplinary, and data-intensive. Progress often depends on teams of investigators, shared datasets and software, rigorous validation of find